To Nick Smith from Maureen C 17 November 2009

Dear Dr Smith
We have today watched with interest Question Time and the whole ETS debate is of concern.  This morning the Prime Minister told Mike Hosking that no-one knows what it will cost because no-one knows the price of carbon.

To John Key and Nick Smith from Simon B 4 November 2009

This is my reply to your letter dated 07/10/09 and the included Article by the NZ Chief Science Advisor. I am sorry it has taken me so long to reply but Prof Gluckmann’s article took quite a while to digest.           I am totally shocked and horrified that you are satisfied that the most reliable information is that provided by the IPCC. But then I realize that much of the advice being given to you comes from parties with a conflict of interest. It must be accepted that there are vast amounts of money at stake in the Global Warming arena, Carbon Credits and the ETS legislation.


To John Key from Resource Users Association NZ INC 7 November 2009

Dear Sir,

The UNITED NATIONS Copenhagen “Treaty” –
There is a rapidly growing ground swell of public resentment because of your Government’s policy to force New Zealand into a subservient position under the totalitarian authority of the United Nations (UN).
Your Government does not have a people mandate to impose ‘government with enforcement’ under the heel of a foreign dictatorship via a possible UN “Treaty”.

John Key to Les H and back again 6 November 2009

Original Message -----

Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 7:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Contains Potentially Offensive Language] Climate change, the science is not settled!

On behalf of the Prime Minister, Hon John Key, I acknowledge your recent email.



To John Key from Rob S 6 November 2009

You have shown in your first year of office to be a thoughtful human being who's success is a direct result of your ability to think about things before making a commitment.

Two Letters to The Press from a Climate Realist


30 October 2009
The Editor,
The Press.
Dear Sir,
An article in today’s Press suggest your readers may be becoming confused and depressed with all the negative talk about global warming. Perhaps a few positive facts from Professor Ian Plimer, School of Earth and Environment Sciences, Adelaide, will help them feel better. 

Why I am a Climate Realist- Dr Willem de Lange

NZCPR Guest Forum 

23 May 2009

In 1996 the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Second Assessment Report was released, and I was listed as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernable human influence on climate.
I was an invited reviewer for a chapter dealing with the economic impact of sea level rise on small island nations.
In keeping with IPCC procedures, the chapter was written and reviewed in isolation from the rest of the report, and I had no input into the process after my review of the chapter draft. I was not asked if I supported the view expressed in my name, and my understanding at the time was that no evidence of a discernable human influence on global climate existed.

To John Key, Nick Smith, Tim Groser from Tony O 2 November 2009

I am writing to you about the Copenhagen Treaty on Climate Change with the signing due in December, just weeks away.

Spuriously the treaty is all about combating global warming and climate change. In reality it's about a United Nations One World Governmentand power.The very name "Climate change" is absurd. Climate change has been happening for millions of years. Using climate change shows it is not understood. Global warming, if it exists, is quite different. There is more evidence to show climate change is a myth. There is much suspect or fictitious science used by the alarmists.


To John Key from Les H 1 November 2009

Hi John
It will never cease to amaze me that vested interest involved in this man made climate change fiasco, including the Greens, United Nations and now our current government (based on the ETS proposals to be taken to Copenhagen) can continue to promote and endeavour to enforce a 'carbon' tax regime on the world when science together with satellite and ocean sensor observations in place since 1978 are telling us the period from 1998 to the present day, is showing a climate and ocean temperature reduction in real terms... And also indicates this climate temperature reversal will likely eliminate all (natural) warming identified to 1998 developing into a climate cooling cycle extending through the next decade...


To Nick Smith from Michael D 22 October 2009

Dear Dr Smith,

It would be nice to think you may personally read this but perhaps that may be wishful thinking.
You may claim the IPCC is unbiased but the world is very much in doubt about that.
Don’t refer alarmist publications to us we have had them for 15 years. Why don’t you read some of the other points of view.
You will be unable to show any irrefutable figures to prove that man made C02 is responsible for any global warming at all. I challenge you to do so. The fact that the opposite has often happened and is happening now  seems like water of a ducks back you and the alarmists. You refer the “record” CO2 levels but just like IPCC you miss out the periods where CO2 was up to 7000 ppm. Another hockey stick effect.


Subscribe to RSS - blogs