To John Key from Resource Users Association NZ INC 26 October 2009


Dear Sir,
The UNITED NATIONS Copenhagen “Treaty” –
This so-called “Treaty”, to be ratified early in December, is plainly a UN ‘constitutional’ document for the purpose of establishing a bestial world-wide governmental DICTATORSHIP. The countries that ratify it with their representative’s signatures will immediately lose their sovereignty and freedom forever.

To the Select Committee from the Kiwi Party


Submission to address the following terms of reference of the Committee's review:
# identify the central/benchmark projections which are being used as the motivation for international agreements to combat climate change; and consider the uncertainties and risks surrounding these projections
# consider the impact on the New Zealand economy and New Zealand households of any climate change policies, having regard to the weak state of the economy, the need to safeguard New Zealand’s international competitiveness, the position of trade-exposed industries and the actions of competing countries.

To the Select Committee from H D B 13 October 2009

I make this submission as the owner of a hill-country sheep and beef breeding and finishing farm.

The ETS, even in the amended form now proposed, will ruin NZ.

Labour rammed it through the House. I think I remember that when someone said, very sensibly, that NZ should not allow itself to become isolated in world markets but should instead be a "fast follower" in emissions control our then Prime Minister replied "It is not in NZ's nature to be a follower. We must lead the world." That was vanity and ambition.

The ETS, if implemented, will hit every one of us very hard in the hip pocket through greatly increased prices for everything, especially fuel and power, transport and all products made with them; but this will be the least of our worries.


To John Key from Peter F 15th September 2009

John Key
Prime Minister of New Zealand

Dear Prime Minister,

This is addressed to you because I no longer have any faith in your Climate Change Minister Dr Smith. He seems quite incapable of distinguishing evidence from hype with respect to climate change. The science is actually very simple but he clearly refuses to read anything contrary to his beliefs and fails to understand the difference between physical evidence and computer models, the latter being based on unproven assumptions (we should now say “on proven false assumptions”)


To Nick Smith from Peter F 2009


Dear Dr Smith
I have just received a copy of the pamphlet New Zealand’s 2020 Emissions Target. I am angry over the shear dishonesty in figures, masquerading as science, quoted in this pamphlet. I am also really angry that you want to charge every taxpayer $30 per week plus increase fuel, power and food, to tilt at windmills, or is it to be able to grandstand at Coppenhagen.
When you were made climate spokeperson in opposition I thought National had someone who could sort the sheep from the goats. I sent you several critical articles that showed that CO2 is not a driver of climate change but it is obvious that you are not reading any of the scientific evidence that disputes the IPCC’s hypothetical models.

To Nick Smith from Peter F 2009

 Dear Dr Smith

I am appalled at the decision to proceed with an ETS. The scientific evidence is now in and very clear. CO2 is not a driver of climate change.
The definitive evidence that shows that CO2 is not responsible for climate change was published on 26 August in a paper by Professor R Lindzen (Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 36, No. 16. (26 August 2009), L16705.)

To the Select Committee from the Centre for Resource Management Studies 21 May 2009




Further Submission by the CRMS to the Select Committee: Review of the Emissions Trading Scheme. (As requested by Dr Paul Hutchison.)


1.         Background
Both the US and the New Zealand governments are pondering their commitment to an Emissions Trading Scheme and how best to implement it – or even whether to implement one at all.
Agriculture is a major issue in both countries. New Zealand’s agriculture is our major export earner while US agriculture is a major beneficiary of the internal trade in which farm subsidies are exchanged for votes.
However, while New Zealand farmers are faced with buying carbon credits because our ruminants belch methane into the atmosphere, US farmers are selling carbon credits because their grasslands sequester carbon into the soil.

To John Key and others from Michael D 7 October 2009


I did meet you with PeterVavaour a few years ago when you were kind enough to give us half an hour of your time in Parliament buildings
I have voted for and supported National all my life (I am now 64)
The passing and pursuit of the ETS is a farce. You must know there is no correlation between global warming and CO2
IPCC is a joke and we will soon be the laughing stock of the world.
If National passes the ETS National will NEVER get another vote or support from any of the five people in my family.
Very very sincerely
Michael D

From John Key to Maureen C 6 October 2009


On behalf of the Prime Minister, Hon John Key, I acknowledge your recent email.
Thank you for taking the time to write to the Prime Minister and share your views.
Briane Smith
Private Secretary, Office of the Prime Minister

To John Key from Maureen C 16 September 2009

Good afternoon Mr Key


“Today's debate about global warming is essentially a debate about freedom. The environmentalists would like to mastermind each and every possible (and impossible) aspect of our lives.”


Vaclav Klaus

President Czech Republic 2003 and re-elected 2008

from his book Blue Planet in Green Shackles.


We can only hope this man attends the Copenhagen conference.



Subscribe to RSS - blogs
Error | Climate Realists


The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.