climaterealists's blog

John Key to Les H and back again 6 November 2009

Original Message -----

Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 7:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Contains Potentially Offensive Language] Climate change, the science is not settled!
 

On behalf of the Prime Minister, Hon John Key, I acknowledge your recent email.

 

Tags: 

To John Key from Rob S 6 November 2009

John,
You have shown in your first year of office to be a thoughtful human being who's success is a direct result of your ability to think about things before making a commitment.
 
Tags: 

Two Letters to The Press from a Climate Realist

 

30 October 2009
 
The Editor,
The Press.
 
Dear Sir,
 
An article in today’s Press suggest your readers may be becoming confused and depressed with all the negative talk about global warming. Perhaps a few positive facts from Professor Ian Plimer, School of Earth and Environment Sciences, Adelaide, will help them feel better. 

Why I am a Climate Realist- Dr Willem de Lange

NZCPR Guest Forum 

23 May 2009

In 1996 the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Second Assessment Report was released, and I was listed as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernable human influence on climate.
I was an invited reviewer for a chapter dealing with the economic impact of sea level rise on small island nations.
 
In keeping with IPCC procedures, the chapter was written and reviewed in isolation from the rest of the report, and I had no input into the process after my review of the chapter draft. I was not asked if I supported the view expressed in my name, and my understanding at the time was that no evidence of a discernable human influence on global climate existed.

To John Key, Nick Smith, Tim Groser from Tony O 2 November 2009

I am writing to you about the Copenhagen Treaty on Climate Change with the signing due in December, just weeks away.

Spuriously the treaty is all about combating global warming and climate change. In reality it's about a United Nations One World Governmentand power.The very name "Climate change" is absurd. Climate change has been happening for millions of years. Using climate change shows it is not understood. Global warming, if it exists, is quite different. There is more evidence to show climate change is a myth. There is much suspect or fictitious science used by the alarmists.

Tags: 

To John Key from Les H 1 November 2009

Hi John
It will never cease to amaze me that vested interest involved in this man made climate change fiasco, including the Greens, United Nations and now our current government (based on the ETS proposals to be taken to Copenhagen) can continue to promote and endeavour to enforce a 'carbon' tax regime on the world when science together with satellite and ocean sensor observations in place since 1978 are telling us the period from 1998 to the present day, is showing a climate and ocean temperature reduction in real terms... And also indicates this climate temperature reversal will likely eliminate all (natural) warming identified to 1998 developing into a climate cooling cycle extending through the next decade...

Tags: 

To Nick Smith from Michael D 22 October 2009

Dear Dr Smith,

 
It would be nice to think you may personally read this but perhaps that may be wishful thinking.
 
You may claim the IPCC is unbiased but the world is very much in doubt about that.
 
Don’t refer alarmist publications to us we have had them for 15 years. Why don’t you read some of the other points of view.
 
You will be unable to show any irrefutable figures to prove that man made C02 is responsible for any global warming at all. I challenge you to do so. The fact that the opposite has often happened and is happening now  seems like water of a ducks back you and the alarmists. You refer the “record” CO2 levels but just like IPCC you miss out the periods where CO2 was up to 7000 ppm. Another hockey stick effect.
Tags: 

To John Key from Resource Users Association NZ INC 26 October 2009

 

Dear Sir,
 
The UNITED NATIONS Copenhagen “Treaty” –
This so-called “Treaty”, to be ratified early in December, is plainly a UN ‘constitutional’ document for the purpose of establishing a bestial world-wide governmental DICTATORSHIP. The countries that ratify it with their representative’s signatures will immediately lose their sovereignty and freedom forever.
Tags: 

To the Select Committee from the Kiwi Party

 

Submission to address the following terms of reference of the Committee's review:
# identify the central/benchmark projections which are being used as the motivation for international agreements to combat climate change; and consider the uncertainties and risks surrounding these projections
# consider the impact on the New Zealand economy and New Zealand households of any climate change policies, having regard to the weak state of the economy, the need to safeguard New Zealand’s international competitiveness, the position of trade-exposed industries and the actions of competing countries.
Tags: 

To the Select Committee from H D B 13 October 2009

I make this submission as the owner of a hill-country sheep and beef breeding and finishing farm.

The ETS, even in the amended form now proposed, will ruin NZ.

Labour rammed it through the House. I think I remember that when someone said, very sensibly, that NZ should not allow itself to become isolated in world markets but should instead be a "fast follower" in emissions control our then Prime Minister replied "It is not in NZ's nature to be a follower. We must lead the world." That was vanity and ambition.

The ETS, if implemented, will hit every one of us very hard in the hip pocket through greatly increased prices for everything, especially fuel and power, transport and all products made with them; but this will be the least of our worries.

Tags: 

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - climaterealists's blog