Submitted by climaterealists on Sun, 20/12/2009 - 21:29
Governance structure” will be set up to control taxes on CO2 emissions
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Saturday, December 19, 2009
Although the final Copenhagen agreement is largely being dismissed as a failure by both the mainstream media and climate skeptics, it does establish the framework for a global government which will control climate finances via taxes on CO2 emissions, as Lord Monckton warned on The Alex Jones Show this week.
Monckton said that the main goal of Copenhagen was to “establish the mechanism, the structure, and above all the funding for a world government.”
Submitted by climaterealists on Sat, 19/12/2009 - 18:51
The IPCC is not a reliable scientific body. Grave concerns about the review process and content have been raised by respected scientific commentators and climate scientists, including IPCC expert reviewers - several of them New Zealanders!
Submitted by climaterealists on Sat, 19/12/2009 - 18:06
Position
My submission opposes both this bill and the old bill.
Introduction
I am sure you are aware of the following information, but my submission requires a degree of background to put it into context.
Submitted by climaterealists on Sat, 19/12/2009 - 18:02
Climate Change and Global Warming
I am writing to you as I am concerned that the direction Parliament is taking in promoting an ETS
that will cause enormous economic damage to New Zealand as a whole, it will drive many of our
citizens to poverty and bankrupt the New Zealand economy. From my letter below, you will see
that the evidence for global warming being man made does not exist.
Submitted by climaterealists on Sat, 19/12/2009 - 17:58
Re ETS
I find it unbelievable that the western world can so readily and happily sign up to taxing itself to hell and back on the distorted orchestrations of IPCC.
IT IS VERY CLEAR THAT THERE IS NO CORELATION BETWEEN MAN MADE CO2 IN THE ATMOSPHERE AND WARMING TEMPERATURES.
Submitted by climaterealists on Sat, 19/12/2009 - 17:51
Dear Minister
I am writing this to express my extreme dissatisfaction with your performance as the minister in charge of climate change negotiations. The Prime Minister, when he was still Leader of the Opposition, answered a question of mine by saying perception is reality. My perception is that we are being governed by an incompetent bunch of fools.
Submitted by climaterealists on Sat, 19/12/2009 - 17:40
Mr. Smith
All my working life has been in agriculture and I have witnessed many changes, however I think the changes to come will surpass them all. My plan was to semi retire by purchasing a 100 hectare block or there abouts to run enough stock to cover costs and a have bit extra left over for little luxuries, however having considered the policies you are promoting to combat global warming I have come to the conclusion that I would be committng economic suicide by continuing with this plan.
Submitted by climaterealists on Sat, 19/12/2009 - 17:37
Dear Ministers: -
Simon Power, Shane Ardern, Chester Burrows, Craig Foss, Nathan Guy,
Louise Upston & Anne Tolley, Chris Tremain, David Carter.
Enclosed is material regarding the mobile Green Rig that is under the financial management of our Horizons Regional Council and is currently touring around the countryside visiting our schools.
I belong to a Taumarunui Farmers Group 2008 who initially came together to submit against the One Plan and while deliberations are still on going, we are also mindful of our children and the future of agriculture.
Submitted by climaterealists on Sat, 19/12/2009 - 17:35
Dear Minister
I find it impossible to contain my frustration at New Zealands emissions reduction target for Copenhagen that I heard announced on Radio New Zealand's Checkpoint programme on last evening, and Morning Report this morning. Contrary to what you, and others like Simon Boxer say, the science is NOT showing that increased urgency is required. The climate is NOT getting warmer faster than originally 'predicted'. In fact, the last few years have seen some cooling. You stood on the steps of Parliament supporting the protest against the "Fart tax". I consider it extreme hypocrisy, in the light of current science revealing more and more conclusively that human produced greenhouse gases are NOT causing global warming, that you can now stand up and justify such an expensive and economically damaging target.
Submitted by climaterealists on Sat, 19/12/2009 - 17:34
I made a submission to the Emissions Trading Scheme Review Select Committee. I asked to speak to that submission, and believed it was my right to be heard. So I was somewhat surprised when I was informed I would not have the chance to speak to the committee. There were sections of the submission I would have written differently, had I realised I would not be speaking to my submission. I believe that you are now nearing the end of the task of hearing submissions. Presumably you will now be considering the rest of the submissions. I am taking the liberty of sending you the comments I would have made to the committee, and I respectfully request you give these additional thoughts and comments due consideration.
Pages
